Rockridge Institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Motto:	Rethinking progressive politics.
	Reframing public debate.
	Changing public policy.
Senior Fellows:	George Lakoff
	Glenn W. Smith
	Eric Haas
Executive Director:	Bruce Budner
Headquarters:	Berkeley, CA, USA
Homepage:	www.rockridgeinstitute.org^{[dead link]}

The Rockridge Institute was an American non-profit research and progressive think tank located in Berkeley, California from 2003 until April 30, 2008.^[1] Its stated goal was to strengthen democracy by providing intellectual support to the progressive community.^[2] The Rockridge Institute promoted progressive ideas and values, studied their implications, and worked to provide an effective articulation of those values to shift public discourse.

1 Framing
2 Dissolution
3 See also
4 External links
5 References

[edit] Framing

Main article: Framing (social sciences)

Founded by the prominent cognitive linguist George Lakoff, the Rockridge Institute seeks to examine the way that frames—the mental structures that influence our thinking, often unconsciously—determine our opinions and values.^[3]^[4] Based on extensive research in human cognition, the Rockridge Institute argues that the way an issue is framed—the language used to describe it and the metaphors used to understand it—influences our political views as much, or more, than the particulars of a given policy.^[5]

Accordingly, the Rockridge Institute attempts to monitor the manipulative use of framing, particularly by right wing organizations and politicians, and to promote frames that encourage progressive thinking. A much discussed example of framing is the Bush administration's use of the phrase War on Terror to describe its policies following the September 11th attacks. The use of the "war" metaphor, the Rockridge Institute and others have contended, has had a tremendous effect on U.S. policy and public debate.^[6] They further contend it has allowed the president to assume war powers, makes opposition to the "war" seem unpatriotic, and was used to justify the invasion of Iraq, although coöperation between Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein had not occurred.^[7] If the U.S. response to September 11 had been framed as a criminal proceeding, the Rockridge Institute and others argue, such extraordinary measures would never have garnered sufficient political support.^[8]

The Rockridge Institute sought to raise consciousness about manipulative framing and to propose progressive frames on a wide range of issues, including the economy, immigration, religion, and the environment.